Ten Miles Square


December 07, 2012 11:06 AM Help Republicans Rescue Their Party From Itself

By Jonathan Alter

Cruelty, fear, cowardice, xenophobia and disrespect invaded the inner sanctum of the U.S. government this week, bringing embarrassment and dishonor to what was once the greatest deliberative body in the world: the U.S. Senate.

On Dec. 4, former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, an 89- year-old Republican whose right arm was shattered in combat during World War II, was wheeled into the Senate chamber by his wife to rally support for a United Nations treaty that should have been entirely unobjectionable.

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, negotiated under President George W. Bush and signed by more than 150 nations, takes a stand against “discrimination on the basis of disability” and in favor of “respect for inherent dignity.” It’s a largely symbolic document with implementation language that consists mostly of a weak recommendation for “due consideration” of its lofty aims. Even so, with U.S. leadership, it could promote compassion for the disabled in dozens of countries where they are cruelly shunned.

Senator James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican who long ago discredited himself as a serious person by championing junk science on climate change, said on the Senate floor, “This unelected bureaucratic body would pass recommendations that would be forced upon the United States if we were a signatory.”

That’s completely false. Not a single clause or phrase in the treaty impinges on national sovereignty, unless one believes — as some xenophobic neo-isolationists do — that the UN itself is a threat to the U.S.

Dramatic Appearance

Dole’s dramatic appearance was meant to advance the values of compassion and nondiscrimination, not the UN. He was trying to rally the 13 Republican senators needed to reach the two- thirds supermajority necessary for ratification. All Democrats voted in favor. In the end, only eight Republicans voted “aye,” almost all of them senators who have announced plans to retire or are in safe seats.

Sometimes-reasonable Republicans such as Saxby Chambliss of Georgia Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee were profiles in cowardice and voted no. They fear primary challenges in 2014 from radicals in their party. Thad Cochran of Mississippi, his common sense and conscience succumbing to right-wing nonsense in real time, changed his vote from “aye” to “nay” when he saw the measure would lose.

As the New Hampshire Republican Kelly Ayotte pointed out, the only impact the treaty would have on Americans would be to make it easier for disabled people to live and work in other countries. Democratic Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, referring to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which was signed by Republican President George H. W. Bush, said Dole had come to the chamber because “he wants to know that other countries will come to treat the disabled as we do.”

Imagine that: Taking a stand for basic human decency around the world.

Opposition to the treaty was led by two of the party’s ayatollahs: former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum and the talk-show host Glenn Beck. None of their arguments made sense even on their own terms. It was especially disturbing that Santorum brought his daughter Bella, who suffers from a rare genetic disorder, into the debate. He argued, preposterously, that under the treaty the UN could order that she be left to die. Lest we forget, Santorum took a credible shot at the Republican presidential nomination this year and could be a contender for 2016.

‘Stupid Party’

The big question in U.S. politics is how to stop the Republican Party from sinking into the role of what Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal called “the stupid party.” The negative attention generated by the primary victories of radicals such as Todd Akin in Missouri and Richard Mourdock< in Indiana — who both self-destructed this year over ugly comments about rape — might be good for Democrats in the short-run. Long-term, though, a healthy two-party system is in everyone’s best interest.

The options for Republicans are simple. They can do nothing and allow the Santorums and Inhofes to hijack the party. Or they can move past the post-election rationalizations and create what might be called a “Real Republican” movement.

One immediate response should be to finance and repurpose the conservative super political-action committees that made such a splash in 2012. Unless the Supreme Court changes, those groups are going to be with us for a while; they might as well be put to good use.

Although super-PACs failed spectacularly in the general election, several shaped the outcome of the Republican presidential primaries. They need to be involved in the 2014 House and Senate primaries on behalf of fiscally conservative candidates, not fringe players badly out of touch with the mainstream of the country.

Eventually, both parties must look beyond their narrow self-interest and get serious about reforming the primary process. California, Washington state and Louisiana now have top-two systems in which the first- and second-place primary finishers, regardless of party, are on the ballot in the November general election.

The top-two arrangement, though it was defeated in a referendum last month in Arizona, has led to some strange repeat matches involving candidates from the same party, such as California Democratic Representatives Howard Berman and Brad Sherman running against each other in both the primary and the general. (Sherman won.)

So far, there’s scant evidence of the new approach yielding more moderate candidates in the general election. But it’s early yet — California’s system debuted this year — and experiments in other states could lead to the loosening of the radical- Republican stranglehold on so many primaries.

The U.S. primary system, a product of the Progressive movement, is only about 100 years old. It can be changed without messing with the Constitution. If we want to see fewer displays of craven behavior such as the rejection of the disabilities treaty, let’s rescue our politics from the forces of extremism.

Back to Home page

Jonathan Alter a contributing editor of the Washington Monthly, is the author of one book on Franklin D. Roosevelt and two on Barack Obama.


  • BillFromPA on December 10, 2012 11:16 AM:

    You say, 'The big question in U.S. politics is how to stop the Republican Party from sinking into the role of what Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal called the stupid party.'

    No, the Big Question is, why should anyone outside of the GOP give a rat's a$$ about the viability of this Neanderthal party? Even when they were 'sane' they were a speed bump on the highway to the future, eff 'em. Everything Liberals have actually accomplished for this country as been inspite of, not in concert with the GOP. Yes, there were GOP votes for civil rights legislation, but only because there were moderate and even liberal repugs then, try to find either now. If the GOP got smart, they'd still oppose Obama Care, hate non-whites and treat women as simpletons who don't know what's good for them, they'd just keep quite about it.

    I'm glad the mask is off, the GOP is seen for what it is, I'm enjoying it's death throes, if that's what's happening now.

  • a waser on December 10, 2012 2:42 PM:

    Please, please don't deign to halt the GOP's slide into the ever more fantastical nether regions. We - the outside world - have come to greatly enjoy the ongoing spectacle.

  • RL on December 11, 2012 8:57 AM:

    There's an element to this general discussion that's mostly ignored: there already is a perfectly viable "conservative" policy agenda. It includes cap & trade, a health care mandate, and immigration reform. That these are rejected as soon as Democrats & Liberals treat them as serious ideas speaks to the political dysfunction of the GOP. But there's no lack of worthwhile policies.

  • Jack on December 12, 2012 3:50 PM:

    I just wonder why no one here admits that socialism fails too. ie. failed policies of Greece, Spain, Italy, Portugal, the former Soviet Union, Venezuala, Cuba? Hell, even Fidel Castro said communism doesn't work. When conservative ideals of small government are denegrated by complete idiots like you, and you fail to not understand history outside of your own "Unions are awesome!" mentality, and realize that they are precisely why companies outsource labor to foriegn countries. Free markets are the ONLY way innovation occurs. Socialism does not produce anything other than countries of people in poverty, massive oppression BY LAW and incarceration, and a ruling party who stays in power for decades. It would seem that "the party of stupid" is the democrats.

  • Neil B on December 12, 2012 5:55 PM:

    Jack, more liberal nations like Finland are doing well. Your gripe and "argument" is a straw man, using idiotic epithets like "socialist" that don't apply to the US or even Europe, really. You also take advantage of the timing trick of catching them in a big recession, you could play that game during TGD to pretend that *capitalism* didn't work. The nations of Europe are in a mess mostly because of *neo*liberal takeovers that let financial interests wreck those economies in the *absence* of reugluatory controls.

    "Fine minds make fine distinctions."

  • Lee Gibson on December 22, 2012 5:23 PM:

    The world will be a better place when the Republican party has disappeared from it.