Ten Miles Square


June 12, 2013 3:13 PM Immigration Reform and the Growing Asian-American Vote

By Raymond A. Smith

The poor showing of the G.O.P. among Latino voters in 2012 is the political subtext for much of the immigration debate in Congress this week. But Republicans also need to consider the impact of their words and deeds on the nation’ s fastest growing demographic: Asian-American voters, who are at least as invested in the immigration issue as Latinos.

As recently as the early 1990s, many Republicans considered the Asian-American population to be a “natural constituency” for their party, given the traditionalist social views, entrepreneurial orientation, and relatively high socioeconomic status of many Asian Americans. At the time, this was borne out by vote tallies: in the three-way presidential race of 1992, George H.W. Bush received 38% of the national electorate but 55% of the Asian-American vote.

By 2012, however, Mitt Romney drew the support of just 28% of Asian Americans. In every category of age, citizenship, ethnicity, and nativity, Asian Americans (here taken to include people of Pacific Islander ancestry) now report a preference for the Democrats.

The two-decade long collapse in Republican support among Asian-American voters towards the Democrats has been ascribed to multiple causes, including the end of the Cold War, changes in the demographic composition of the Asian-American population, and broader shifts towards the Democratic party in the heavily-Asian West Coast states and Hawaii, where nearly half of Asian Americans reside. But the politics of immigration has also been key.

The shift of Asian-American allegiances is often traced back to Republican Pete Wilson’s harshly anti-immigrant campaign for governor in 1994. That was also the year of the infamous Proposition 187 that sought to cut off essentially all state government services to undocumented immigrants and their children. The ensuing backlash accelerated the collapse of the G.O.P. in California, which had been the party of both Nixon and of Reagan.

The story of Prop 187, and immigration in general, is usually seen through the lens of California’s huge Latino population. But the clout of the Asian-American immigrant population will be increasingly hard to discount. Between 2000 and 2010, people of Asian ancestry were the fastest-growing ethnoracial group, increasing by 46% — including an increase in every state of the union. Since 2009, immigration from Asian countries has outstripped that from Latin American countries.

Nearly three-quarters of Asian Americans were born abroad. As first-generation Americans, they remain very close to the immigration experience, and are likely to be affronted by rhetoric and policies that are harshly or indiscriminately anti-immigrant . A survey by the Asian-American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF) found that 65% of Asian American voters in 2012 (including a majority of registered Republicans) supported comprehensive immigration reform, including a path to citizenship for undocumented people.

The heavy concentration of Asian Americans in such “deep blue” states as Hawaii, California, Washington, New Jersey, and New York may at first glance diminish the G.O.P.’s incentive to focus on Asian-American concerns. But the Asian American population grew in every state of the union between 2000 and 2010. At about 18 million people, or 5.6 percent of the population, Asian Americans nationwide are now nearly half as numerous as African Americans.

In 2012, not only did Asian Americans come out in full force for the Democrats, but voter turnout also increased by 50%. Granted, this was still only from 2% of the electorate to 3%. But that percentage will only increase as more and more become eligible for naturalization, acculturate to the U.S., or reach voting age. Comparatively well-off and well -educated, Asian Americans are precisely the kinds of voters who are most likely, over the long run, to show up at the voting booth.

Not coincidentally, Asian Americans also have increasing influence in the political sphere. The number of Asian American candidates for the House tripled between 2010 and 2012, and Congress now includes an all-time high contingent of 11 Asian Americans (all Democrats). The rate of increase is stunning — of all the Asian Americans ever elected to the House, almost half have been seated since 2005.

If Republicans are serious about being more than a “rump party” of disaffected conservative whites, or hope to lure in at least a few more voters of color, the Asian-American population has become too big to ignore. And for this population of immigrants, the next steps taken by the G.O.P. could shape opinions for a decade to come.

Raymond A. Smith a Senior Fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute, teaches political science at Columbia and NYU and is an investigator in the Division of Gender, Sexuality, and Health at the Columbia University Medical Center. He is the author of Importing Democracy: Ideas from Around the World to Reform and Revitalize American Politics and Government and editor of The Politics of Sexuality.


  • bluestatedon on June 14, 2013 9:23 AM:

    And yet still another article at WM about the GOP's demographic troubles that doesn't mention religion. It's almost as though all these writers and analysts are completely unaware that the Republican Party is run philosophically and politically by people who sincerely believe that Adam and Eve had vegetarian dinosaurs for neighbors in the Garden of Eden 5,000 years ago, who believe that evolution is a Satanic fraud, and who believe that the science of embryology is from "the pit of Hell." Are all these writers also unaware of the deep respect if not reverence for education among Asian immigrant groups, with the related fact of huge numbers of Asian American students performing at the top academic levels in every elite private and public university and college? Why would Asian Americans place their trust in a political party that is openly devoted to the perpetuation of ignorance because of fealty to the doctrine of Biblical inerrancy?

    This refusal to address the overtly religious character of today's Republican Party is mind-boggling, and makes me suspect that writers at WM and elsewhere are actually afraid to do so for fear of Christianist criticism.

  • superdestroyer on June 15, 2013 8:31 AM:

    Are Asian-Americans willing to pay the higher taxes, higher insurance rates, and give up spots at Tier I in order to support comprehensive immigration reform.

    I suspect that Asian-Americans believe that whites will fell all of the negative impacts of comprehensive immigration reform while they will be able to take advantage.

  • Bill on June 18, 2013 8:30 AM:

    Don's insistence that the GOP is controlled by fundamentalists seems to be belied by the fact that it's last two presidential nominees were John McCain (whose disdain for the religious right is well-known) and Mitt Romney (a Mormon who chose a Catholic running mate). Certainly the fundamentalists have a lot of influence in the party, but it simply isn't true that dim-witted creationists control the party. It seems to me that the GOP remains firmly in the control of Wall Street, whatever bones it may throw to the fundamentalists to get them to the polls. If the fundies were in command then Mike Huckabe would have been the nominee. Imho.